Applications Note
Full searchable text · 2 pages
Refer to the original PDF for tables, figures and page layout.
Page 1 www.alliedhightech.com Allied High Tech Products, Inc. Call for more information: 800.675.1118 Applications Note 1200 (P-4000) Grit vs. 1200 Fine Grit Descriptions 1200 (P-4000) grit abrasive discs are sputter coated. This causes the silicon carbide (SiC) particles to be randomized, which provides more of a “polishing” action. 1200 (P-4000) grit is recommended for general removal of deformation from a previous step. 1200 Fine grit abrasive discs are electrostatically coated. This causes the SiC particles to stand on end, which provides more of a “cutting” action. 1200 Fine grit is recommended for soft materials that smear, step grinding for failure analysis, or when continued material removal is desired (typically after 600 grit). Surface Finish Comparison Material Removal and Durability Aluminum rods were encapsulated in green phenolic mounting powder, while steel rods were encapsulated in red phenolic mounting powder (Figure 2). They were ground separately to a 600 grit finish using the MetPrep 3™ grinder/polisher with PH-3™ power head. The mounts were then ground using 1200 (P-4000) grit and 1200 fine grit to compare material removal using the procedure outlined in Table 1. Only one abrasive disc was used for each test; the disc was not changed in order to determine durability for each set of conditions. Material removal was checked every minute using a digital indicator measurement system. Figure 1: 5X objective, Brightfield. Left: Aluminum rod ground using 1200 (P-4000) grit. Right: Aluminum rod ground using 1200 fine grit. Figure 2: Aluminum rods (green) and steel rods (red) were mounted in phenolic. Page 2 www.alliedhightech.com Allied High Tech Products, Inc. Call for more information: 800.675.1118 2 Table 1: MetPrep 3™ with PH-3™ Grinding Parameters Variable Specification Platen RPM 300 Sample RPM 150 Direction Comp Force (per sample) 6 lbf Time 1 min Testing was first performed using three aluminum and steel mounts and then repeated using only one of each mount, to compare material removal under different conditions (Figure 3). The data shows that 1200 fine grit discs remove much more material over the same amount of time than 1200 (P-4000) grit discs. The removal rate dropped off after 2-3 minutes, indicating that they should be discarded after that timeframe for the best results. Figure 3: Graphs showing rates of material removal for the rod samples. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 Average Material Removal (µm) Minute 1200 (P‐4000) Grit 3 Al Samples 1 Al Sample 3 Steel Samples 1 Steel Sample 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1 2 3 4 5 6 Average Material Removal (µm) Minute 1200 Fine Grit 3 Al Samples 1 Al Sample 3 Steel Samples 1 Steel Sample